Your cart is currently empty!
Blog
Rent for Sex Investigation by Newcastle ACORN
Sex-for-rent landlords listen up: before you post that next advert on Craigslist or Gumtree, ask yourself if you’re willing to risk being exposed by ACORN.
ACORN supports the recognition of sex work as legitimate work, with full protection from the law, unionisation, and the right to say no. The tenant-landlord relationship is a different power dynamic. It is inherently exploitative with no right to say no without risking losing your home. The authorities might not take this seriously, but we very much do.
A Grenoble, les locataires du bailleur social Actis manifestent car ils ont froid chez eux
Ils ont manifesté car ils en ont assez d’avoir froid. Une cinquantaine de locataires de logements sociaux de Grenoble ont envahi, ce matin, les locaux d’Actis, l’un des bailleurs sociaux de la ville. Ils dénoncent la vétusté de leurs appartements dans le quartier de l’Abbaye.
Des plaids en guise de banderoles, une cinquantaine de locataires a envahi les bureaux d’Actis, le bailleur social grenoblois.Dans le quartier de l’Abbaye, 120 appartements sont concernés. Dans la plupart, la température plafonne à 17 degrés. Alors certains vivent en peignoir et en chaussons fourrés, plusieurs couches de couvertures sur eux lorsqu’ils sont immobiles.
Et ce n’est pas tout, fuites dans le toit, mauvaise isolation, humidité… Les locataires du quartier n’en peuvent plus et demandent des travaux d’urgence.
Reportage Jordan Guéant, Maxime Quéméner, Virginie Muamba :
RCEP will hurt local industry and allow workers’ exploitation, says civil society
Copy of Article on Down to Earth
The trade agreement is being negotiated in secrecy, but it is likely to favour big companies and threaten India’s agriculture, industry and e-commerce sectors
Negotiations over a proposed free trade agreement, Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), will have severe impacts on the state of agriculture and manufacturing industries in India, and may allow for exploitation of workers and natural resources in India, civil society representatives say.
The 18th round of negotiations on RCEP is being held in Manila, Philippines among 16 countries that account for 50 per cent of the global population and 29 per cent of the world’s GDP. These include 10 members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)—Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam—and six other countries having existing free trade agreements with ASEAN: Australia, China, India, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand.
Civil society representatives say that the agreement in being discussed secretively. “In the past four years and to this day, no text has been made available to members of the public, parliamentarians, civil society or media,” says Dharmendra Kumar, director of India FDI watch, a Delhi-based non-profit.
The agreement will considerably reduce import duties for a range of goods in agriculture, manufacturing and service industries, allowing foreign companies to compete with domestic counterparts. According to India FDI Watch, RCEP mandates import duties in the range of 0-3% for member countries. India’s current duty on industrial goods is 10 per cent at an average, and 32.5 per cent for agricultural products.
Allowing exploitation
“Reduction of import duties to promote global value chain will lead to mass layoffs, low wages and further exploitation,” says Gautam Mody, General Secretary, New Trade Union Initiative (NTUI).
“Global value chains thrive by exploiting workers who are paid low wages, tied to informal jobs with extreme job volatility, and offered no or declining social protection measures, all of which are necessary to ensure profits for the rich companies. RCEP undermines technological development in developing countries and hence does not work either for creating sustainable employment or for local value addition in developing countries” he adds.
Local agriculture, which is dominated by small and marginal farmers in India, will also feel the impact of the free trade agreement. K T Gangadhar, president of Karnataka Rajya Raitha Sangha (KRRS), a farmers’ organisation, says, “The ASEAN has already devastated our plantation workers. The RCEP will have even stronger impacts on agricultural jobs. Not only will RCEP extract further access in plantation products for ASEAN, it will threaten livelihoods in sectors like dairy, meat and other agricultural products by allowing duty free imports of subsidised products from Japan, New Zealand and Australia,” says Gangadhar.
Reduction of duty is likely to put India at disadvantage in its trade ties with China. “India has a large trade deficit (Rs 3.45 lakh crores in 2015-16) with China, which will increase after RCEP. Companies producing steel and heavy machinery have already raised the concern that this would lead to displacing of local manufacturing by Chinese imports,” Dharmendra Kumar says. Garment, ceramics and electronics sectors will also feel the pressure due to cheaper Chinese imports.
Upper hand for rich companies
Governments of developing countries will be restricted from making policies that regulate foreign investors, favour domestic industry, or change labour laws and wage policies, under the agreement.
“RCEP will include the infamous Investor-State-Dispute-Settlement Mechanism (ISDS) that allows foreign companies to challenge policies and judicial decisions in secret arbitration cases,” says Adil Shariff, additional general secretary, Indian National Municipal and Local Bodies Workers Federation.
He explains the implication of the agreement, with example,“There are numerous cases, for example, between Veolia (French company) and Egypt, that show how foreign companies can challenge any change in labour laws (such as the Minimum Wages Act or maternity benefit provisions in India) as it increases in their cost of operation. In addition to the compensation demanded by companies, the litigation itself is financially devastating. In one case, Philippines had to pay US$ 58 million, which it could have used for the vaccination of 3.8 million children,” says Shariff.
E-commerce sector at risk
The e-commerce chapter in RCEP will impose binding rules that will force developing nations like India to give away data, a highly prized industrial resource, for free to big companies in Japan, New Zealand, Australia and China.
“This will seriously affect millions of small independent offline retailers and street vendors in India, as well as SME manufacturing sector workers as digitised products will compete with physical goods made in India”, says Dharmendra Kumar, who works with small retailers in India.
“The wholesale duty-free import of goods by e-commerce giants like Alibaba in China will threaten local products developed by SMEs and domestic job creation in those segments,” he adds.
ACORN at Long Last Wins battle at the Constitutional Court of Italy
This past Thursday the Corte Costituzionale – Supreme Court of the Italian Republic – wrapped up 6 years of enduring battle ruling in favor of our case against so called ‘black rents’.
Ever since ACORN International was founded in 2004 it had the goal of expanding his organizing operations throughout the globe, naturally dealing in each country within the frame of its particular issues and legislations. Its second chapter in the European Union after the Czech Republic was opened in Italy in 2011, and from the very beginning it started dealing with the widespread, longstanding plague of landlords renting out their properties without handing out regular contracts, but just blackmailing their tenants in a manner of “you either pay and ask for no right, nothing, or you’re out”.
The law protected such landlords simply because… there was no law, preventing them to do so, and so they got away with it. Until 2011.
Enter ACORN, and as we start our operations that very year a new national law comes into force that allows through a certain not-so-simple procedure the tenants to report their situation to a government agency and get, as reward and protection, a legal rent at a tenth of the monthly price and with all the righteous housing rights finally enforced. We as ACORN Italy provided all of the assistance to make that not-so-simple procedure simple and help the tenants – now our dues paying members – get the job done and the house secured.
Our success was unprecedented, we at the peak reached out and subscribed members nationwide, from the southernmost regione (state) of Sicily all the way up to the northernmost of Trentino Alto-Adige.
We caught the attention of the national press, the national government, both the House and the Senate and, of course, of angry tax-evading landlords who thanks to us could evade taxes no more, and bully (or much worse: the threats we received were numerous and of various kinds) our tenants-members.
Eventually we also caught the attenton of the Supreme Court of Italy which in march 2014 ruled against this law only because of a technicality while still calling it “revolutionary”, not the kind of word you’d normally expect from Supreme Court Justices.
That was true mayhem, meaning potentially and suddenly thousands of tenants homeless and having to pay back all the money ‘saved’ (skyhigh amounts at that point) and as ACORN Italy we managed in an unprecedented effort within two months only to have the President of Italy sign into law a safeguarding law that litterally saved all our members from going bankrupt and under bridges. Chaos didn’t end there, though: in july 2015 also the case for this law reached its Supreme Court hearing and this one was also struck down. Frustration and, quite frankly, despair came with it. We didn’t throw in the towel though, against all odds and advices, we stayed extroardinarily (desperately?!) Focused and at the very last minute of the last voting in the House, late december 2015, we managed to pass yet a new law that again reverted the situation in our and justice’s favour. At that point, everybody strongly doubted we could make it again and be heard, together with our members’ voices and the voice of equality, justice, fight against black rents and tax evasion.
Still, we managed, but as soon as early in 2016 yet again we were notified that our case had to be defended for a very final time at the Supreme Court. Where we certain to pull it off, after two straight losses? Hardly.
Did we get a verdict? Finally, yes, and finally a positive one… on an unforgettavble April 13th, 2017 the Supreme Court of the Italy gace it’s very final ruling and upheld our law, sealing positively a story that started with our foundation in Italy on September 12th, 2011.
We can safely say that ACORN Italy took the most relevant stand against the most relevant chunk of tax evasion as a whole in the history of the Italian Republic, and wether that’s ‘classical’ community organizing or just a slightly different form of it, we as an international community can well be extra proud of what we achieved, defended and now definitely won, and now can start thinking of our future, a new story to write, a next step in community organizing to take. Standing very well proud. Organizing people for power.
David Tozzo, Presidente nazionale ACORN Italy